is.team vs Screencap: Features, Pricing & Which Is Better (2026)

A side-by-side comparison of is.team and Screencap — features, pricing, and ideal use cases — to help you decide which AI tool fits your workflow.

is.team

IS.TEAM LLC

Freemium

An infinite-canvas project board where AI coding agents connect over MCP, subscribe to cards and reply in chat alongside the team.

MCP Agent Boards: Claude, Cursor and ChatGPT connect over MCP, subscribe to a board and reply in card chat while they work, so agents behave like teammates rather than external tools.
Infinite Canvas Workspace: Tasks, notes and planning share one zoomable surface, replacing separate tracker, whiteboard and chat tools.
AI Workflow Planner: Generates and sequences the work for a board so a project can be broken down without manual ticket writing.
AI Card Assistant: A per-card helper that drafts, summarizes and answers questions inside the context of a single task.
Meeting Note Taker: Captures meeting notes using one-time workspace credits and extracts actionable tasks straight onto the board.
Per-Workspace Pricing: A flat workspace fee covering up to 15 seats on the Pro plan, so adding an engineer never triggers a surprise invoice.
Integrations and Webhooks: HMAC-signed webhooks plus Zapier and Make connections, with API access and LLM API tokens on higher tiers.
Real-Time Collaboration: Live multi-user editing with voice chat, screen sharing, sprints, time tracking and a timeline view.

Agent-Assisted Development: Letting a coding agent pick up a card, do the work and report progress in the same thread the team is reading.
Tool Consolidation: Replacing a Jira, Slack and Miro combination with a single canvas for engineering leads tired of context-switching.
Small Team Planning: Running sprints, timelines and time tracking for a startup team on a flat monthly workspace fee.
Meeting-to-Backlog Workflow: Turning recorded meeting notes into extracted, assigned board tasks without manual transcription.
Automated Intake: Collecting work through embeddable forms that create cards automatically on the right board.
Cross-Tool Automation: Wiring board events to Zapier or Make through signed webhooks so downstream systems stay in sync.

Proteus Computer Use

Freemium

Local-first macOS screen recorder that captures, labels, and indexes team workflows so knowledge stays searchable and private.

Local-First Capture: Recordings live in ~/.screencap on your Mac and never leave unless you explicitly share them.
On-Device Task Segmentation: An on-device model breaks long recordings into labeled tasks like payroll runs, expense approvals, or CRM data entry.
Full-Text Search of Workflows: Every spoken word and on-screen moment is indexed so any past workflow can be surfaced months later by search.
Privacy-Enforced Recording: Password managers and banking apps are cut before a frame is written; email and chat are masked in real time.
MCP Context Snapshots: While recording, Screencap queries connected MCP servers to capture the exact Gusto/Attio/Linear/Notion record on screen inside the video.
Deliberate Sharing With PII Scrubbing: Every shared copy is scrubbed of names, secrets, and PII, and only the recordings you pick ever leave the machine.
Source-Available Codebase: The full capture engine, encryption, agent, and anonymizer are public on GitHub under PolyForm Noncommercial 1.0.0.

Team Onboarding: Assemble ordered collections of real workflow recordings so new teammates learn exactly how work is actually done.
Institutional Knowledge Capture: Preserve the tacit steps behind payroll runs, reconciliations, and quarterly reports as searchable video.
Ops Documentation: Replace stale wikis by pointing teammates at labeled task recordings that stay current with the real system.
Compliance-Sensitive Recording: Capture back-office work in banking, finance, and HR without leaking passwords, account balances, or PII.
Computer-Use Dataset Contribution: Optionally donate reviewed, scrubbed recordings to a public dataset for training open computer-use models.