Hy4 preview vs OCR Arena: Features, Pricing & Which Is Better (2026)
A side-by-side comparison of Hy4 preview and OCR Arena — features, pricing, and ideal use cases — to help you decide which AI tool fits your workflow.
Hy4 preview
Tencent
Tencent's open-weight Hy4 preview, a 770B-parameter Mixture-of-Experts model with 49B active parameters and a 1M-token context window.
Key features
- 770B Mixture-of-Experts Architecture: Holds 770 billion total parameters while activating only 49 billion per token, so capacity scales without proportional inference cost.
- 1M-Token Context Window: Accepts inputs exceeding one million tokens, allowing whole codebases, long document sets or extended agent traces in a single prompt.
- Apache 2.0 Open Weights: Released under a permissive licence that allows commercial use, modification and redistribution with no separate agreement.
- Productivity Task Focus: Tuned for real-world coding, office work and scientific research rather than narrow benchmark optimisation.
- Multi-Product Availability: Accessible globally through Tencent's WorkBuddy, CodeBuddy, Yuanbao and ima applications in addition to the raw weights.
- API Access via TokenHub and OpenRouter: Can be called through Tencent Cloud TokenHub or OpenRouter for teams that prefer hosted inference over self-hosting.
Best for
- Whole-Repository Code Work: Load an entire codebase into the million-token context to reason about refactors and cross-file dependencies at once.
- Long-Horizon Agent Tasks: Drive multi-step agent workflows where the full history of tool calls and intermediate results must stay in context.
- Self-Hosted Deployment: Run a frontier-scale open-weight model on private infrastructure where data cannot leave the organisation.
- Scientific Literature Analysis: Ingest large collections of papers or experimental logs and synthesise findings without chunking the input.
- Office Document Processing: Summarise, draft and restructure long reports, contracts and spreadsheets in enterprise workflows.
- Commercial Fine-Tuning: Adapt the weights for a proprietary product under the Apache 2.0 licence without negotiating a model licence.
OCR Arena
OCR Arena
A free playground to test, compare, and rank foundation VLMs and open-source OCR models on uploaded documents.
Key features
- Side-by-side Model Comparison: Run multiple foundation VLMs and open-source OCR models on the same uploaded document to directly compare outputs, errors, and behavior.
- Document Upload and Processing: Upload PDFs, images, or scanned documents and process them through selected OCR/VLM models to obtain extracted text and structured results.
- Accuracy Measurement and Metrics: Compute quantitative accuracy metrics for model outputs against ground truth or expected results to enable objective performance evaluation.
- Public Leaderboard and Voting: Publish results to a public leaderboard where users can vote for the best-performing models and view community rankings.
- Support for VLMs and Open Models: Evaluate both large foundation vision–language models and a variety of open-source OCR models within the same interface.
- Community-Driven Benchmarking: Enable collaborative, reproducible benchmarking by sharing evaluation cases, leaderboards, and community feedback on model performance.
- Upload documents and images for model evaluation
- Run multiple VLMs and OCR models side-by-side on the same input
- Automated accuracy measurement and performance metrics
- Public leaderboard to view and vote on top-performing models
- Support for open-source OCR models and foundation VLMs
- Web-based UI for interactive testing and comparison
Best for
- Model Selection for Document Workflows: Compare multiple OCR and VLM options on representative invoices, contracts, or receipts to choose the most accurate model for production use.
- Research and Development Benchmarking: Researchers benchmark new OCR architectures or fine-tuned VLMs against existing open-source models using standard inputs and accuracy metrics.
- Quality Assurance for OCR Pipelines: QA teams run sample documents through candidate models to quantify extraction accuracy before deploying OCR updates.
- Community Validation and Crowdsourced Rankings: Open-source contributors and practitioners submit model runs and vote to surface strong models for particular document types or languages.
- Pre-deployment Evaluation: Engineering teams validate how different models handle noisy scans, handwriting, or multilingual documents to reduce deployment risks.
- Educational Demonstrations: Instructors and students test differences between VLMs and OCR methods to teach practical trade-offs in real document scenarios.
- Compare OCR and VLM model accuracy on specific document types before integration
- Benchmark open-source OCR engines against foundation models for research
- Evaluate OCR performance on invoices, receipts, forms, and scanned documents
- Community-driven model selection via leaderboard voting
- Model selection and validation during document-processing pipeline development