HOL Guard vs is.team: Features, Pricing & Which Is Better (2026)

A side-by-side comparison of HOL Guard and is.team — features, pricing, and ideal use cases — to help you decide which AI tool fits your workflow.

HOL Guard

HOL

Freemium

HOL Guard sits between AI coding agents and their tools to intercept risky reads, installs, MCP registrations, and config changes before execution.

Pre-execution Interception: Wraps agent launch commands so risky reads, installs, MCP registrations, and config or hook changes are surfaced as a reviewable diff before they run.
Under 50 ms Local Scan: All scanning happens on-device with no outbound network call, keeping agent workflows fast and usable fully offline.
One-keystroke Approval Flow: Each block presents the diff on screen so the developer can allow or deny with a single key, and the decision is written to a local receipt.
Multi-Harness Support: Ships tailored integrations for Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode, Gemini CLI, Hermes, and OpenClaw so the same policy engine covers every agent.
Guard Cloud Sync: Optional cloud tier syncs decision receipts, alerts, and audit history across machines while never uploading file contents, prompts, or environment variables.
Team Policy Packs: Team plan deploys shared policy packs, team alerts, and investigation routing so multiple developers operate under the same runtime rules.
Plugin Scanner for Maintainers: Companion CLI and GitHub Action verify plugin manifests, MCP transport posture, and skill-level prompt-injection markers before release.

Blocking secret exfiltration: Stop a coding agent from reading .npmrc, .env, or cloud credential files during an automated task.
Guarding MCP installs: Review new MCP server registrations for insecure HTTP endpoints or wildcard binds before they are added to the harness.
Enforcing config approvals: Require an explicit allow on config or hook edits proposed by an agent so surprise supply-chain changes are caught in place.
Team-wide policy control: Roll out a single Guard policy pack across a team so every developer's Cursor or Claude Code session enforces the same runtime rules.
Cross-device continuity: Sync approval history through Guard Cloud so switching laptops does not force a developer to re-approve safe actions from scratch.
Plugin release gating: Use the plugin-scanner action in CI to fail PRs that publish plugins below a minimum trust score or with high-severity issues.

IS.TEAM LLC

Freemium

An infinite-canvas project board where AI coding agents connect over MCP, subscribe to cards and reply in chat alongside the team.

MCP Agent Boards: Claude, Cursor and ChatGPT connect over MCP, subscribe to a board and reply in card chat while they work, so agents behave like teammates rather than external tools.
Infinite Canvas Workspace: Tasks, notes and planning share one zoomable surface, replacing separate tracker, whiteboard and chat tools.
AI Workflow Planner: Generates and sequences the work for a board so a project can be broken down without manual ticket writing.
AI Card Assistant: A per-card helper that drafts, summarizes and answers questions inside the context of a single task.
Meeting Note Taker: Captures meeting notes using one-time workspace credits and extracts actionable tasks straight onto the board.
Per-Workspace Pricing: A flat workspace fee covering up to 15 seats on the Pro plan, so adding an engineer never triggers a surprise invoice.
Integrations and Webhooks: HMAC-signed webhooks plus Zapier and Make connections, with API access and LLM API tokens on higher tiers.
Real-Time Collaboration: Live multi-user editing with voice chat, screen sharing, sprints, time tracking and a timeline view.

Agent-Assisted Development: Letting a coding agent pick up a card, do the work and report progress in the same thread the team is reading.
Tool Consolidation: Replacing a Jira, Slack and Miro combination with a single canvas for engineering leads tired of context-switching.
Small Team Planning: Running sprints, timelines and time tracking for a startup team on a flat monthly workspace fee.
Meeting-to-Backlog Workflow: Turning recorded meeting notes into extracted, assigned board tasks without manual transcription.
Automated Intake: Collecting work through embeddable forms that create cards automatically on the right board.
Cross-Tool Automation: Wiring board events to Zapier or Make through signed webhooks so downstream systems stay in sync.