linkgo

CleanSlop vs Graphiti: Features, Pricing & Which Is Better (2026)

A side-by-side comparison of CleanSlop and Graphiti — features, pricing, and ideal use cases — to help you decide which AI tool fits your workflow.

CleanSlop logo

CleanSlop

CleanSlop

Freemium

Scans vibe-coded apps for launch-blocking issues like leaked keys and data exposure, and reports what to fix first, right from your coding agent.

Key features

  • Agent-Native Scanning: Tell Claude Code, Codex, Cursor or other agents to scan with CleanSlop and fix findings where you build.
  • System-Level Code Mapping: Maps routes, background jobs, data and external services so each finding follows a real call path.
  • Prioritized Reports: Findings grouped as needs attention, worth a look and minor, worst first.
  • Evidence for Every Finding: Shows where each issue lives in your code and why it was flagged.
  • Plain-English Fixes: Explains what is wrong, why it matters and what to do about it.
  • Copy for LLM: Hands any report to your AI tool so it can apply the fixes.
  • GitHub App Integration: Scan only the repositories you select, read-only access.
  • Expert Triage Calls: Book a 15-minute call with a CleanSlop engineer to walk through findings.

Best for

  • A solo founder checks a Next.js and Supabase app built with an AI coding assistant before launching.
  • A developer discovers an exposed AI API key bundled into browser code and moves it to a server route.
  • A side-project builder verifies that one user's data cannot be read by another through database policies.
  • A Claude Code user runs a scan from the terminal and has the agent fix the top findings.
  • A team lead gets a short prioritized list instead of hundreds of linter warnings.
  • An indie hacker books an expert triage call to confirm an ambiguous finding.
View CleanSlop details
Graphiti logo

Graphiti

getzep (GitHub)

Free

Open-source project to build real-time knowledge graphs and persistent memory stores for AI agents.

Key features

  • Real-time Graph Construction: Extracts entities and relationships from incoming text and builds a dynamic graph representation so agent context is stored as structured nodes and edges for fast retrieval.
  • MCP-Compatible Server API: Exposes endpoints and protocols aligned with Model Context Protocol patterns to let AI agents query episodes, entities, and contextual graph data as persistent memory.
  • Document Ingestion and Registration: Registers documents across multiple formats into the graph store, enabling documents to be linked, searched, and referenced by agents in retrieval workflows.
  • Graph Database Integration: Supports integration with graph-backed storage (examples and forks reference Neo4j and FalkorDB) to persist entities, relationships, vectors, and perform graph queries.
  • Episode-Based Memory Management: Groups interactions into episodes with metadata (UUIDs, timestamps) to enable chronological context, session tracking, and selective retrieval of past interactions.
  • Multi‑Project & Docker Deployment: Community forks and examples provide CLI and Docker Compose setups to run root and project-specific MCP servers, enabling multi-project sharing of a single graph database.
  • Developer Tooling & Extensibility: Source-code-first, open repository structure allows customization, extension, and integration into agent stacks and RAG pipelines.
  • Extract entities and relationships from text to build knowledge graphs
  • Persist graph data in Neo4j graph database
  • Model Context Protocol (MCP) server implementation for context serving
  • Docker Compose and CLI tooling for quick local deployment and multi-project setups
  • Support for project-specific MCP servers sharing a common database (multi-tenant graphs)
  • Document registration and ingestion across multiple file formats for RAG workflows
  • Integrations/examples showing usage with Cursor and agent systems to store prompts as graph memory

Best for

  • Persistent Conversational Memory: Provide chatbots and assistants with long-term memory by storing and retrieving entities and relationships learned across sessions.
  • RAG Backend for Document Search: Index and link documents into a knowledge graph so retrieval-augmented generation pipelines can find relevant passages via graph relationships and metadata.
  • Agent Context Sharing Across Projects: Run multi-project MCP servers so multiple agents or teams can share and query a centralized knowledge graph for consistent context.
  • Debugging and Traceability: Use episode grouping and entity links to trace agent decisions back to source documents and previous interactions for audit and improvement.
  • Entity Relationship Discovery: Extract and visualize relationships across ingested content to discover connected concepts, people, locations, or events for analytics or recommendation systems.
  • Providing persistent structured memory for conversational AI agents
  • Backend for retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems using graph storage
  • Indexing and searching entities/relations from ingested documents
  • Multi-project knowledge graph deployments that share a central Neo4j instance
  • Developer experimentation and prototyping of graph-based context for models
View Graphiti details