Capacity vs is.team: Features, Pricing & Which Is Better (2026)

A side-by-side comparison of Capacity and is.team — features, pricing, and ideal use cases — to help you decide which AI tool fits your workflow.

Capacity

Freemium

AI no-code app builder that turns a plain-English idea into a live web app with logins, payments, and a shareable URL.

Conversational app spec: Capacity asks clarifying questions about your idea before it starts building instead of guessing your intent.
Full production stack: generated apps include member accounts, logins, saved data, and payments — real product features, not demo scaffolding.
One-click deploy: publish your app to a shareable URL the same day, with custom domains available in minutes.
AI co-founder support: describe any bug or change in natural language and the agent explains, fixes, and iterates on the app for you.
Codebase export: on Growth and above you can export the full underlying codebase so a developer can take it over anytime.
Multi-device design: responsive UI for phones, tablets, and desktop comes standard, with style controlled by plain-English direction.
Credit-based billing: credits are consumed only when the AI is actively building or editing, and never expire.
macOS desktop app: dedicated Mac client for local building without a credit card required.

Non-technical founder validates an MVP idea by describing it and shipping a working prototype the same day.
Solopreneur builds a paid membership app with logins, saved profiles, and Stripe-style payments without hiring a developer.
Small business owner spins up an internal tool or client portal with a custom domain in minutes.
Product manager prototypes a v0 of a new feature and iterates by conversation before handing an exported codebase to engineers.
Creator ships a niche landing page or micro-app around a specific audience using only plain-English direction.
Team standardizes multiple internal apps under one workspace and manages usage with credit budgets.

IS.TEAM LLC

Freemium

An infinite-canvas project board where AI coding agents connect over MCP, subscribe to cards and reply in chat alongside the team.

MCP Agent Boards: Claude, Cursor and ChatGPT connect over MCP, subscribe to a board and reply in card chat while they work, so agents behave like teammates rather than external tools.
Infinite Canvas Workspace: Tasks, notes and planning share one zoomable surface, replacing separate tracker, whiteboard and chat tools.
AI Workflow Planner: Generates and sequences the work for a board so a project can be broken down without manual ticket writing.
AI Card Assistant: A per-card helper that drafts, summarizes and answers questions inside the context of a single task.
Meeting Note Taker: Captures meeting notes using one-time workspace credits and extracts actionable tasks straight onto the board.
Per-Workspace Pricing: A flat workspace fee covering up to 15 seats on the Pro plan, so adding an engineer never triggers a surprise invoice.
Integrations and Webhooks: HMAC-signed webhooks plus Zapier and Make connections, with API access and LLM API tokens on higher tiers.
Real-Time Collaboration: Live multi-user editing with voice chat, screen sharing, sprints, time tracking and a timeline view.

Agent-Assisted Development: Letting a coding agent pick up a card, do the work and report progress in the same thread the team is reading.
Tool Consolidation: Replacing a Jira, Slack and Miro combination with a single canvas for engineering leads tired of context-switching.
Small Team Planning: Running sprints, timelines and time tracking for a startup team on a flat monthly workspace fee.
Meeting-to-Backlog Workflow: Turning recorded meeting notes into extracted, assigned board tasks without manual transcription.
Automated Intake: Collecting work through embeddable forms that create cards automatically on the right board.
Cross-Tool Automation: Wiring board events to Zapier or Make through signed webhooks so downstream systems stay in sync.