Apache Maka vs Lumi: Features, Pricing & Which Is Better (2026)
A side-by-side comparison of Apache Maka and Lumi — features, pricing, and ideal use cases — to help you decide which AI tool fits your workflow.
Apache Maka
The Apache Software Foundation
Apache-licensed local-first agent workspace that runs tools in a sandbox and records every model message and tool call as a recoverable execution log.
Key features
- Append-Only Execution Record: Model messages, tool calls, tool results, permission decisions, and turn termination events are written down durably, so the transcript is evidence rather than a disposable chat buffer.
- Context Trimming Without Data Loss: Old tool output can be omitted from the next prompt to shorten context while the full saved history remains intact and inspectable.
- Single Runtime Host: Desktop, terminal, and evaluation all execute through one runtime, so behavior does not diverge between how you develop and how you benchmark.
- Sandboxed Tool Boundary: Built-in Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Glob, and Grep tools run under a sandbox; anything leaving that boundary requires approval, and Computer Use and catalog skills are opt-in.
- Crash Recovery and Resume: Runs can be aborted, failures are classified, and an interrupted turn can optionally be resumed rather than restarted from scratch.
- Session Branching and Search: The desktop workspace supports creating, archiving, searching, renaming, retrying, regenerating, and branching sessions from any turn.
- Bring Your Own Model: Connect a cloud API, a locally hosted model, or a compatible gateway, with streaming output, thinking, usage reporting, and clearer provider errors.
- Declarative Evaluation Harness: maka eval expands multi-arm experiments into task by repetition by subject cells with immutable per-cell attempts and a result kernel covering score, normalized usage, attributable cost, duration, and failure reason.
- Local-First Storage: Sessions, settings, artifacts, and run records stay on the machine by default, with local memory and optional web search when configured.
Best for
- Auditable Agent Runs: Keeping a defensible record of exactly what an agent did and which permissions were granted during a task.
- Long Coding Sessions: Working through a multi-turn refactor with branching and resume instead of losing state when a turn fails.
- Agent Benchmarking: Running reproducible multi-arm experiments comparing models, prompts, or external agent subjects on the same task set.
- Air-Gapped or Regulated Work: Running an agent workspace where sessions and artifacts must remain on local infrastructure.
- Cost and Usage Analysis: Attributing token usage, cost, and duration per experiment cell to decide which model configuration to ship.
- Terminal Workflows: Driving an agent from the current project directory or scripting a single non-interactive turn from CI or a shell.
- Open-Source Agent Research: Building on a permissively licensed runtime whose execution semantics and architecture are fully documented.
Lumi
A Google PAIR prototype that adds AI-powered annotations, granular summaries, and custom Q&A to arXiv research papers.
Key features
- Granular Summaries: Generates summaries at multiple granularities (section- or paragraph-level) to surface key ideas and make long papers easier to skim and comprehend.
- Inline Annotations: Attaches contextual, sentence- or paragraph-specific annotations directly onto the paper text to explain terminology, methods, or results in place.
- Custom Q&A: Lets users ask targeted questions about a paper and receive context-aware answers derived from the document content to clarify methods, results, or motivations.
- arXiv Integration: Built specifically to work with arXiv papers, enabling quick access to preprints and their metadata while preserving original paper structure.
- Open-Source Prototype: Source code available under an Apache-2.0 license on GitHub, allowing inspection, reuse, and community-driven improvements.
- Research Navigation Aids: Provides tools to jump between sections, references, and highlighted insights to streamline literature review workflows.
- Contextual Highlighting: Highlights important sentences and phrases based on AI analysis to draw attention to key contributions and claims.
- Collaboration-Friendly Outputs: Produces shareable annotations and summaries that can be used to coordinate reading lists and group discussions.
- Inline annotations layered on top of arXiv papers
- Granular and multi-level summaries for sections and full papers
- Custom Q&A over the paper content (user-driven queries)
- Lightweight AI layer integrated into the reading interface
- Browser/web-based reading experience (lumi.withgoogle.com)
- Open-source codebase on GitHub (Apache-2.0) allowing local integration and extension
- Designed for improved paper navigation and comprehension
Best for
- Rapid literature review: Quickly generate section-level summaries across many arXiv papers to triage and prioritize reading lists.
- Clarifying complex passages: Ask focused questions about specific paragraphs or figures to get concise, context-aware explanations.
- Teaching and learning: Instructors and students use inline annotations and summaries to make advanced papers accessible in coursework.
- Collaborative annotation: Teams annotate papers with AI-generated notes to share insights and discussion points during journal clubs or research meetings.
- Relevance triage: Determine whether a paper contains needed methods or results without reading it end-to-end by scanning AI-highlighted passages and summaries.
- Research discovery: Identify related work and key contributions faster by surfacing dominant themes and claims within a paper.
- Accelerating literature reviews and paper digestion for researchers
- Explaining complex methods or equations within academic papers
- Creating Q&A study aids from research articles
- Annotating and sharing insights on arXiv papers within teams
- Prototyping integrations that enhance document-based workflows