ACE Studio 2.0 vs Laguna by Poolside: Features, Pricing & Which Is Better (2026)
A side-by-side comparison of ACE Studio 2.0 and Laguna by Poolside — features, pricing, and ideal use cases — to help you decide which AI tool fits your workflow.
ACE Studio 2.0
ACE Studio
DAW-native singing voice cloning and production tool (VST3) for royalty‑free vocal conversion and commercial music workflows.
Key features
- DAW-Native VST3 Plugin: Provides a VST3 plugin that loads inside major DAWs for low-latency recording, monitoring, track automation, and seamless routing with existing session workflows.
- Royalty-Free Vocal Conversion: Converts voice recordings into commercially-usable singing performances with licensing that enables legal use in released music and monetized projects.
- Custom Voice Training: Allows users to train custom vocal models from user-supplied recordings (example workflows reference ~30-minute uploads) to produce personalized singing clones that retain timbre.
- Performance Retention: Preserves expressive elements of performances — timing, vibrato, dynamics, and emotional nuance — so generated vocals sound natural and performative rather than synthetic.
- Choir and Harmony Modes: Generates multi-voice harmonies and choir-style layers from a single source performance, enabling dense backing vocals and stacked arrangements without manual overdubbing.
- Export & Interoperability: Exports generated vocals as stems and aligned MIDI/pitch data for further editing, pitch-correction, and mixing in standard audio formats used in professional sessions.
- Voice-to-voice singing conversion preserving performance nuance
- Custom training from user audio uploads (30-minute example training length referenced)
- Choir modes for multi-voice generation
- DAW-native integration (VST3 plugin) for in-studio workflow
- Royalty-free / commercially-ready vocal conversion licensing (advertised)
- Association with foundation-model work (co-led ACE-Step diffusion/transformer music model)
- Model and tooling distribution via GitHub and Hugging Face repositories
- Project file format (.acep) used by desktop app (third-party utilities exist for encryption/decryption of .acep files)
Best for
- Producing commercial releases with cloned lead or backing vocals when a vocalist is unavailable, using custom-trained voices for final masters.
- Rapid demo production: generate finished-sounding vocal takes and harmonies inside a DAW to iterate song ideas without booking studio singers.
- Creating choir and stacked backing vocals for film, TV, and game scores without hiring a large ensemble, saving time and budget.
- Localizing vocal content by converting melodies and lyrics into different languages or vocal characters while preserving original performance nuances.
- Songwriting and pre-production: audition multiple vocal timbres and arrangements quickly by swapping trained voice models inside a project.
- Voice-banking for franchises and brands: create royalty-ready voice libraries for use across commercials, jingles, and multimedia assets with clear commercial rights.
- Music producers creating commercially-licensed sung vocals without human singers
- Songwriters and composers prototyping vocal parts directly inside a DAW
- Studios integrating cloned or converted vocals as session tracks via VST3
- Researchers and developers extending or fine-tuning music/voice models (ACE-Step association)
- Content creators needing choir or multi-voice arrangements generated from single-voice recordings
Laguna by Poolside
Poolside
Poolside's family of open Mixture-of-Experts foundation models for agentic coding — XS.2 runs locally, M.1 reaches 72.5% on SWE-bench Verified.
Key features
- Two Model Sizes: Laguna XS.2 (33B total / 3B active) and Laguna M.1 (225B total / 23B active) target different latency and capability needs.
- Mixture-of-Experts Architecture: Routes each token through a subset of experts for efficiency at large scale.
- Local Deployment: XS.2 is small enough to run on a Mac with 36 GB of RAM via Ollama under an Apache 2.0 license.
- Strong SWE-bench Results: XS.2 hits 68.2% and M.1 reaches 72.5% on SWE-bench Verified.
- Bundled Coding Agent: Ships 'pool,' a lightweight terminal-based coding agent.
- Agent Client Protocol: Includes a dual ACP client-server used internally for agent RL training and evaluation.
Best for
- Local Agentic Coding: Running XS.2 on a laptop for private, offline code generation and editing.
- High-Capability Code Tasks: Using M.1 for harder, long-horizon software engineering work.
- Self-Hosted Deployments: Building on open weights to avoid third-party API dependencies.
- Research & Fine-Tuning: Adapting permissively licensed weights for custom coding workflows.
- Benchmarking: Evaluating agentic coding performance against SWE-bench Verified and Pro.