jurniti vs Speko: Features, Pricing & Which Is Better (2026)
A side-by-side comparison of jurniti and Speko — features, pricing, and ideal use cases — to help you decide which AI tool fits your workflow.
jurniti
jurniti
Managed 24/7 hosting for coding agents, each running in its own Firecracker microVM with your own model keys and no token markup.
Key features
- Firecracker microVM Isolation: Every agent runs in its own KVM-backed virtual machine with hardware-enforced tenant isolation instead of a shared-kernel container.
- Bring Your Own Key: OpenRouter, OpenAI or Anthropic keys live only inside the customer's VM — jurniti never sees them, never proxies calls and never marks up model spend.
- Multi-Harness Support: Runs Claude Code, Codex CLI, OpenClaw, Hermes, OpenCode, Devin CLI, Mastra and Pi, each in its own dedicated microVM.
- Fleet CLI: A jurniti command-line tool to boot agents, list fleet status, dispatch work and copy results back, so the whole fleet is managed from a terminal.
- Swarm Runtime: Boots dozens of isolated microVM workers at once and dispatches the same brief to every worker, with results collected in a single command.
- Flat Per-VM or Hourly Billing: A flat monthly or annual price per agent VM, or per-second metered On-Demand and Spot pricing for bursty workloads, with prepaid credits.
- Automated Provisioning: Payment triggers a magic-link sign-in and an auto-provisioner that has a live microVM running in about three minutes with no human in the loop.
- Custom Subdomain and Sidecars: Pro tiers add a custom subdomain, alongside separate microVM services for multi-agent communication and long-term agent memory.
Best for
- Always-On Coding Agents: Keeping a Claude Code or Codex agent working on a backlog overnight without leaving a laptop running.
- Secure Key Handling: Running agents for a team that cannot let model API keys leave its own infrastructure boundary.
- Parallel Agent Fleets: Dispatching one brief to fifty isolated workers to compare approaches or parallelize a large refactor.
- Bursty Batch Work: Using per-second Spot or On-Demand VMs for agents that only run a few hours a day, paying only for active runtime.
- Self-Hosting Alternative: Replacing hand-rolled VPS setups for open-source agent harnesses like Hermes, OpenClaw or OpenCode.
- Long-Running Agent Memory: Pairing an agent VM with a dedicated memory microVM so knowledge persists between sessions.
Speko
Speko
A router for voice AI that benchmarks 56 speech and language models language by language, then routes each session to the one that wins.
Key features
- Language-by-Language Benchmarks: 56 speech and language models measured across ten languages, exposing that a model topping the English table may have no published rank anywhere else.
- Cost-Versus-Accuracy Charts: Word error rate plotted against dollars per minute for each pipeline stage — STT, LLM, TTS and speech-to-speech — so a model choice is a priced trade-off, not a guess.
- Managed Router: A hosted, provider-neutral data plane at router.speko.dev that selects the winning model per session using the measurements and fails over before a response is returned.
- Typed Contracts: Public OpenAPI and AsyncAPI specifications for the Router, so integrations are generated rather than hand-rolled against an undocumented endpoint.
- Open Gateway Runtime: A customer-side runtime with native LiveKit and Pipecat services offering provider-direct streaming and local BYOK credentials, keeping your vendor relationships intact.
- Drop-In Framework Integration: Swap STT, LLM and TTS in a LiveKit AgentSession for Speko equivalents with credential_source="auto" and model="auto" and get routing without restructuring the agent.
- MCP Server: Point Claude Code or Cursor at mcp.speko.ai to query models, voices and benchmark data from inside a coding agent.
- Two Pricing Paths: Either add 5% on top of a provider's published rate while routing your own spend, or take the bundled Speko infrastructure rate of $0.09 per minute across all three legs.
Best for
- Multilingual Voice Products: Ship a voice agent to non-English markets and route each language to the model that actually performs best there.
- Vendor Selection Research: Use the published benchmarks to decide which STT or TTS provider to sign with before committing to a contract.
- Voice Cost Optimization: Trade a small accuracy delta for a large cost reduction by picking a model at the right point on the WER-versus-price curve.
- Failover and Reliability: Keep voice sessions alive through a provider outage with pre-response failover across the routed model pool.
- LiveKit or Pipecat Migration: Add measured routing to an existing agent stack by swapping in Gateway services rather than rewriting the pipeline.
- Agent-Assisted Model Research: Query the benchmark data from Claude or Cursor over MCP while writing the voice integration.
