CleanSlop vs Visiby: Features, Pricing & Which Is Better (2026)

A side-by-side comparison of CleanSlop and Visiby — features, pricing, and ideal use cases — to help you decide which AI tool fits your workflow.

CleanSlop

Freemium

Scans vibe-coded apps for launch-blocking issues like leaked keys and data exposure, and reports what to fix first, right from your coding agent.

Agent-Native Scanning: Tell Claude Code, Codex, Cursor or other agents to scan with CleanSlop and fix findings where you build.
System-Level Code Mapping: Maps routes, background jobs, data and external services so each finding follows a real call path.
Prioritized Reports: Findings grouped as needs attention, worth a look and minor, worst first.
Evidence for Every Finding: Shows where each issue lives in your code and why it was flagged.
Plain-English Fixes: Explains what is wrong, why it matters and what to do about it.
Copy for LLM: Hands any report to your AI tool so it can apply the fixes.
GitHub App Integration: Scan only the repositories you select, read-only access.
Expert Triage Calls: Book a 15-minute call with a CleanSlop engineer to walk through findings.

A solo founder checks a Next.js and Supabase app built with an AI coding assistant before launching.
A developer discovers an exposed AI API key bundled into browser code and moves it to a server route.
A side-project builder verifies that one user's data cannot be read by another through database policies.
A Claude Code user runs a scan from the terminal and has the agent fix the top findings.
A team lead gets a short prioritized list instead of hundreds of linter warnings.
An indie hacker books an expert triage call to confirm an ambiguous finding.

FNA Technology

Paid

AI visibility platform that tracks how ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini and AI Overviews cite your brand, and ships fixes.

AI Citation Tracking: Continuously samples roughly 50,000 prompts per week across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini and Google AI Overviews to record where and how a brand is cited.
Per-Engine Visibility Scoring: Reports a composite AI Visibility score plus share of voice and prompts won or lost, broken out engine by engine so declines can be traced to a specific model.
Prompts & Citations Explorer: Lets teams open any tracked prompt and read the actual model answer to see which competitor was named and why.
Brand Entity Analysis: Maps the adjectives each engine associates with your brand versus competitors and suggests reframing plays to change that portrait.
Competitor Intelligence: Tracks rival citation share on comparison and 'alternatives to' prompts, highlighting categories where a competitor dominates.
Prioritized Action Plan: Converts findings into P0/P1 recommendations such as schema additions or comparison pages, each with a time estimate and projected score gain.
Site Audit for AI Parseability: Audits pages for missing entity definitions, structured Q&A data and other signals that prevent models from citing the site correctly.
White-Label Reporting and API: Higher tiers add white-label client reports, SSO/SAML and API access for agencies managing multiple brands.

AI Search Monitoring: Marketing teams track whether ChatGPT and Perplexity recommend their product or a competitor on high-intent category prompts.
Competitive Benchmarking: Brands quantify how much citation share a named rival is capturing on 'alternatives to' and 'best of' queries.
Content Prioritization: Content teams decide which pages to write or refresh based on which prompts are currently missed rather than on keyword volume alone.
Technical AEO Audits: SEO specialists find pages lacking FAQ schema or entity markers that keep answer engines from parsing them.
Agency Client Reporting: Agencies run pooled prompt tracking across multiple client workspaces and deliver white-label AI visibility reports.
Executive Reporting: Operators present a weekly digest showing search clicks alongside AI citation share to explain traffic shifts leadership sees.